Skip to main content

Online Arguments

 This week, when considering online arguments, I decided to choose some found in the comment section of an NBC News Instagram post regarding the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial. More specifically, the announcement of his cleared charges. I wanted to evaluate these comments because they revolve around a very current, sensitive, and controversial topic in today's news. I knew there would be a lot of political quarrel, which often turns offensive and heated from both sides. And there was. Upon reading these comments I found multiple concerns and negative outcomes. 

For starters, there was hardly any civility in the comment section of this post. It was a typical conservative versus liberal debate, but without any mediation. One of the main problems I saw were people bashing others based on disagreeing values. While I am all for owning your opinion, I do believe that insulting or using deprecating language towards someone of a different opinion is very concerning. I saw a lot of bold assumptions and accusatory statements made from both liberals and conservatives that ruined any chance of a peaceful online argument. Some of these examples are provided below. A negative that comes from this online argument is division between the population. People tend to have a lot of confidence behind the screen, which leads them to saying more bold and offensive statements. This could cause negatives in a person's personal life if a friend or employer of the opposing views saw their rude comment. Comments on the internet are also far more emotion based, which sometimes releases fake or exaggerated news. These all cause concerns within this case because it revolves around very sensitive topics in America such as racial discrimination or the protection of citizen rights.


While I believe in the right to free speech, I do believe there should be some rules in online arguments. They are as follows:

  1. No insulting language towards others in the argument. This includes name calling, stereotyping, and more.
  2. Do not use threatening language that could escalate an argument.
  3. Fact check your statements before you upload them.
  4. Keep the argument topic-based. Do not bring up outside controversies or events that are unrelated.
  5. Maintain civility and respect in online discussions through receptive language and open mindedness. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Visual Communication Online

  Social Semiotics- The Science of Signs In simple terms, social semiotics study the way humans use semiotics (the study of signs and symbols and their use or interpretation) and apply them in communicative and social situations. Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure and linguist Charles Sanders Pierce were early founders of the concepts of semiotics, however linguists such as Michael Halliday and Roman Jakobson have strong influence on the framework of social semiotics. (Chandler, D). The methods of this framework are important to understand as semiotics are vital to ensure that the intended meanings of signals are understood. Semiotics are often used in marketing to influence customers' subconscious decision making. An example of how this works is shown in the image below. Semiotics are basically broken into three parts: the sign, the signifier, and the signified concepts. Social semioticians apply three important principles when analyzing a semiotic system such as langu...
Post a Comment
Read more

About Me

Hi there! My name is Jada and I am from Grants Pass, Oregon. I am majoring in BioHealth sciences with a pre-pharmacy option. The ultimate goal is to get my pharmaceutical degree and then work as a pharmacist. I am also on the Oregon State track team where I run the short sprints.  Social media is my primary way of communicating online. I mostly use Snapchat and Instagram, and am shamelessly addicted to TikTok. I use these platforms because they are entertaining while keeping me updated on what is occurring in the lives of my friends. I am excited to learn more about communicating online because of how the internet has influence society and my generation in particular!
2 comments
Read more

Toulmin Method

  The Toulmin Method According to page 318 of our class textbook Communicating Online, the Toulmin Method is a form of argumentation that divides an argument into six basic elements: claims, reasons, evidence, warrants, qualifiers, and rebuttals.   (our book did not include grounds or backing, but coincide with reasons) The Toulmin Method Online The Toulmin Method is found in more places that you would think. Any educated argument has some, if not all, elements of the Toulmin Method. An online example I found is an article called  Yes, You Should Wear a Mask. Here’s How and Why . The title of the article is pretty self explanatory, but it is an argumentative and persuasive article about why people should wear masks during the coronavirus pandemic. It includes all six elements of the Toulmin Method as shown below: Claim : You should wear a mask during the pandemic. Reason : Properly wearing a mask or cloth face covering can help keep you safe while navigating the COVI...
Post a Comment
Read more